| |
reverse value of G). In this case, the universe would probably shrink t o a spot (Big Crunch), since
there would be no effect able to stop a gravitational mass collapse.
2. Gravitational Inertia
Davies [7] and Unruh [8] demonstrated that there exists a real QV-reaction force to
accelerated matter, such that mass acceleration and the opposed QV-reaction effect are two forces,
which are intimately interrelated in nature, being the corresponding “Davies-Unruh e ffect” therefore
apparently close to the definition of inertia (a reaction force to acce leration).[7] and [8]
demonstrated to a wider extent the link existing between masses and QV.
Since in the macroscopic world, inertia is the immediate reaction effect opposed to
acceleration, the left component of eq. (12) is therefore analogous to inertia as it is the reac tion force
to mass acceleration. In addition, following the above-mentioned “principle of independency” and
treating the left and the right components of eq. (12) independently, gravitation can be redefined as
consisting of two components:
ZP
M
F
F
F
=
,
(13)
where FM is a ‘pure mass attraction force’ due to the purely attractive gravitational effec t between
two masses as if there were no QV (derived from eq. (12) when G = 1 m3kg-1s-2, i.e., G has no
effect); FZP is the corresponding decelerating ZPF-reaction force, macroscopically known as inertia;
and F is the resulting natural attraction force, which can be measured by man, where G has the
known natural value of 6.673x10-11 m3kg-1s-2.
Finding inertia in (13):
F
F
F
M
ZP
=
,
(14)
and substituting the above mentioned values of G in (14), while expressing each force in the sense
of Newton’s gravitation law, we get the value for gravitational inertia:
2
2
1
2
1
3
11
)
)
10
673
.
6
1
((
d
m
m
s
kg
m
x
FZP
=
.
(15)
As seen in eq. (15), the value of G for gravitational inertia ((1 - 6.673x10-11) m3kg-1s-2) is very close
to 1 (0.99999999993327 m3kg-1s-2) and demonstrates that inertia is a very strong force as expected
from its obviously strong decelerating effect on matter in opposition to light (and other photons) that
is commonly not decelerated by inertia or by any other similar effect.
Since inertia depends on G, and because according to (5), G is a QV-fu nction, if QV did not
exist, there would be no gravitational inertia in the universe, and cele stial bodies and masses in
general would attract mutually without any control, probably shrinking extremely, since an unbiased
mass attraction would possibly make any mass in the universe collapse into small bodies like
neutron stars or black holes. QV seems to be therefore a “background” that guarantees the structural
stability of our universe and should furthermore not be manipulated in a global extend without
stringent physical control.
5
|  |
|
| |
|
|
