| |
3. Non-Gravitational Inertia
For non-mutually attracting bodies, i.e., for individual accelerated objects, (no n-
gravitational) inertia can be derived from (14), by substituting forces through Newton’s equation of
force (F=ma). For a certain mass, pure mass attraction (FM) is per definition equal to the force, it
would produce in the case of the highest acceleration possible, that is, the Planck acceleration
(aP=lP/t2P = 5.560x1051 m/s2). In consequence, substituting aP in (14) in the sense of Newton’s
equation of force, we get:
( ) (
)
a
s
m
x
m
a
a
m
a
m
a
m
F
P
P
ZP
=
=
=
2
51
10
560
.
5
.
(16)
This is inertia of an independent accelerated object of mass m and acceleration a, and shows
that inertia of non-gravitational acceleration too limits strongly the independent mass acceleration,
as already expected with regard to (15). Eq. (16) predicts correctl y the zero inertia of a photon,
since in this case, “a” would be equal to aP (being aP = c/tP, where c = speed of a photon) and FZP =
0.
In consequence, if QV did not exist, there would be no reaction force to non-gravitational
acceleration and bodies would reach unbiased velocities in the universe, which probably would not
allow the formation of stable celestial bodies as they were always destroyed by heavy collisions
with other bodies that would have been violently accelerated by some forces.
In general, without the stabilizing effect of QV, there would be no iner tia at all and the
universe would obviously be a very chaotic place, where matter collided without any control at very
high speeds and unbiased gravitational forces favored the formation of very massive bodies that
would carry very high collision energies, thus rendering an almost self-destructive and/or crunching
universe that probably could not even exist for more than a single moment.
4. Gravity Control through Electromagnetism
Since G has been proven to be a QV-function by (5), the same applies to gravitation through
(12), thus providing the realistic possibility of gravity control through manipulation of ZPE. In fact,
(12) demonstrates that QV-energy density weakens gravity. In consequence, if we were able to
manipulate ZPE, we would be altering gravity through (12). By increasing QV-energy density,
gravity would decrease, while by decreasing the QV-energy density, gravi ty would increase.
Podkletnov [9] discovered in this sense, in a very controversial work, that a “composite bulk
YBa2Cu3O7-x superconductor below 70°K under EM field” was able to produce, what he called
‘weak gravitation shielding’, above and below his superconductor a rrangement. The experiment
was reproduced by Li et al. [10] and others, and explained by this team, Modanese [11], and others.
According to [10], “rotating superconductors in an alternating magnetic field would generate
gravity”. NASA is studying this effect in its High Temperature Superconductor (HTSC) Research
Program, with an aim towards developing technologies for future interstellar navigation.
According to (12), gravity weakens if ZPE increases. Therefore, to produce a ‘gravity
shielding effect’, the above arrangement should have been able to increase local ZPE density. This
could obviously have happened through the involved magnetic fields (superconductor, coils). In
order for a magnetic field to be able to increase ZPE, it is necessary that a transfer of photons from
the magnetic fields to the ZPF, takes place. If this happened, then the higher concentration of
vacuum radiation (photons) around the arrangement would produce a higher radiation pressure on
nearby objects, thus lowering their weight as predicted by (12), what was effectively observed by
Podkletnov.
In consequence, as (12) shows how gravity could be controlled through ZPE manipulation,
Podkletnov’s experiment seems to suggest strongly that this happened through EM fields.
6
|  |
|
| |
|
|
